You may have heard that the NSA can decrypt SSH at least some of the time. If you have not, then read the latest batch of Snowden documents now. All of it. This post will still be here when you finish. My goal with this post here is to make NSA analysts sad.TL;DR: Scan this post for fixed width fonts, these will be the config file snippets and commands you have to use.Warning: You will need a recent OpenSSH version. It should work with 6.5 but I have only tested 6.7 and connections to Github.

The crypto

Reading the documents, I have the feeling that the NSA can 1) decrypt weak crypto and 2) steal keys. Let’s focus on the crypto first. SSH supports different key exchange algorithms, ciphers and message authentication codes. The server and the client choose a set of algorithms supported by both, then proceed with the key exchange. Some of the supported algorithms are not so great and should be disabled completely. This hurts interoperability but everyone uses OpenSSH anyway. Fortunately, downgrade attacks are not possible because the supported algorithm lists are included in the key derivation. If a man in the middle were to change the lists, then the server and the client would calculate different keys.

Key exchange

There are basically two ways to do key exchange: Diffie-Hellman and Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman. Both provide forward secrecy which the NSA hates because they can’t use passive collection and key recovery later. The server and the client will end up with a shared secret number at the end without a passive eavesdropper learning anything about this number. After we have a shared secret we have to derive a cryptographic key from this using a key derivation function. In case of SSH, this is a hash function.

DH works with a multiplicative group of integers modulo a prime. Its security is based on the hardness of the discrete logarithm problem.

Alice           Bob
Sa = random
Pa = g^Sa   --> Pa
                Sb = random
Pb          <-- Pb = g^Sb
s = Pb^Sa       s = Pa^Sb
k = KDF(s)      k = KDF(s)

ECDH works with elliptic curves over finite fields. Its security is based on the hardness of the elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem.

Alice           Bob
Sa = random
Pa = Sa * G --> Pa
                Sb = random
Pb          <-- Pb = Sb * G
s = Sa * Pb     s = Sb * Pa
k = KDF(s)      k = KDF(s)

OpenSSH supports 8 key exchange protocols:

  1. curve25519-sha256: ECDH over Curve25519 with SHA2
  2. diffie-hellman-group1-sha1: 1024 bit DH with SHA1
  3. diffie-hellman-group14-sha1: 2048 bit DH with SHA1
  4. diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1: Custom DH with SHA1
  5. diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256: Custom DH with SHA2
  6. ecdh-sha2-nistp256: ECDH over NIST P-256 with SHA2
  7. ecdh-sha2-nistp384: ECDH over NIST P-384 with SHA2
  8. ecdh-sha2-nistp521: ECDH over NIST P-521 with SHA2

We have to look at 3 things here:

  • ECDH curve choice: This eliminates 6-8 because NIST curves suck. They leak secrets through timing side channels and off-curve inputs. Also, NIST is considered harmful and cannot be trusted.
  • Bit size of the DH modulus: This eliminates 2 because the NSA has supercomputers and possibly unknown attacks. 1024 bits simply don’t offer sufficient security margin.
  • Security of the hash function: This eliminates 2-4 because SHA1 is broken. We don’t have to wait for a second preimage attack that takes 10 minutes on a cellphone to disable it right now.

We are left with 1 and 5. 1 is better and it’s perfectly OK to only support that but for interoperability, 5 can be included.




KexAlgorithms [email protected],diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256




# Github needs diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1 some of the time but not always.
#    KexAlgorithms [email protected],diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1
Host *
    KexAlgorithms [email protected],diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256

If you chose to enable 5, open


if exists, and delete lines where the 5th column is less than 2000. If it does not exist, create it:

ssh-keygen -G "${HOME}/moduli" -b 4096
ssh-keygen -T /etc/ssh/moduli -f "${HOME}/moduli"
rm "${HOME}/moduli"

This will take a while so continue while it’s running.


The key exchange ensures that the server and the client shares a secret no one else knows. We also have to make sure that they share this secret with each other and not an NSA analyst.

Server authentication

The server proves its identity to the client by signing the key resulting from the key exchange. There are 4 public key algorithms for authentication:

  1. DSA with SHA1
  2. ECDSA with SHA256, SHA384 or SHA512 depending on key size
  3. Ed25519 with SHA512
  4. RSA with SHA1

DSA keys must be exactly 1024 bits so let’s disable that. Number 2 here involves NIST suckage and should be disabled as well. Fortunately, RSA using SHA1 is not a problem here because the value being signed is actually a SHA2 hash. The hash function SHA1(SHA2(x)) is just as secure as SHA2 (it has less bits of course but no better attacks).

Protocol 2
HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_ed25519_key
HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key

The first time you connect to your server, you will be asked to accept the new fingerprint.

This will also disable the horribly broken v1 protocol that you should not have enabled in the first place. We should remove the unused keys and only generate a large RSA key and an Ed25519 key. Your init scripts may recreate the unused keys. If you don’t want that, remove any


commands from the init script.

cd /etc/ssh
rm ssh_host_*key*
ssh-keygen -t ed25519 -f ssh_host_ed25519_key < /dev/null
ssh-keygen -t rsa -b 4096 -f ssh_host_rsa_key < /dev/null

Client authentication

The client must prove its identity to the server as well. There are various methods to do that.

The simplest is password authentication. This should be disabled immediately after setting up a more secure method because it allows compromised servers to steal passwords. Password authentication is also more vulnerable to online bruteforce attacks.




PasswordAuthentication no




Host *
    PasswordAuthentication no

The most common and secure method is public key authentication, basically the same process as the server authentication.




PubkeyAuthentication yes




Host *
    PubkeyAuthentication yes

Generate client keys using the following commands:

ssh-keygen -t ed25519 -o -a 100
ssh-keygen -t rsa -b 4096 -o -a 100

You can deploy your new client public keys using



It is also possible to use OTP authentication to reduce the consequences of lost passwords. Google Authenticator is a nice implementation of TOTP, or Timebased One Time Password. You can also use aprinted list of one time passwords or any other PAM module, really, if you enable



Symmetric ciphers

Symmetric ciphers are used to encrypt the data after the initial key exchange and authentication is complete.

Here we have quite a few algorithms:

  1. 3des-cbc
  2. aes128-cbc
  3. aes192-cbc
  4. aes256-cbc
  5. aes128-ctr
  6. aes192-ctr
  7. aes256-ctr
  8. aes128-gcm
  9. aes256-gcm
  10. arcfour
  11. arcfour128
  12. arcfour256
  13. blowfish-cbc
  14. cast128-cbc
  15. chacha20-poly1305

We have to consider the following:

  • Security of the cipher algorithm: This eliminates 1 and 10-12 – both DES and RC4 are broken. Again, no need to wait for them to become even weaker, disable them now.
  • Key size: At least 128 bits, the more the better.
  • Block size: Does not apply to stream ciphers. At least 128 bits. This eliminates 14 because CAST has a 64 bit block size.
  • Cipher mode: The recommended approach here is to prefer AE modes and optionally allow CTR for compatibility. CTR with Encrypt-then-MAC is provably secure.

Chacha20-poly1305 is preferred over AES-GCM because the SSH protocol does not encrypt message sizes when GCM (or EtM) is in use. This allows some traffic analysis even without decrypting the data. We will deal with that soon.




Ciphers [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],aes256-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes128-ctr




Host *
    Ciphers [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],aes256-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes128-ctr

Message authentication codes

Encryption provides confidentiality, message authentication code provides integrity. We need both. If an AE cipher mode is selected, then extra MACs are not used, the integrity is already given. If CTR is selected, then we need a MAC to calculate and attach a tag to every message.

There are multiple ways to combine ciphers and MACs – not all of these are useful. The 3 most common:

  • Encrypt-then-MAC: encrypt the message, then attach the MAC of the ciphertext.
  • MAC-then-encrypt: attach the MAC of the plaintext, then encrypt everything.
  • Encrypt-and-MAC: encrypt the message, then attach the MAC of the plaintext.

Only Encrypt-then-MAC should be used, period. Using MAC-then-encrypt have lead to many attacks on TLS while Encrypt-and-MAC have lead to not quite that many attacks on SSH. The reason for this is that the more you fiddle with an attacker provided message, the more chance the attacker has to gain information through side channels. In case of Encrypt-then-MAC, the MAC is verified and if incorrect, discarded. Boom, one step, no timing channels. In case of MAC-then-encrypt, first the attacker provided message has to be decrypted and only then can you verify it. Decryption failure (due to invalid CBC padding for example) may take less time than verification failure. Encrypt-and-MAC also has to be decrypted first, leading to the same kind of potential side channels. It’s even worse because no one said that a MAC’s output can’t leak what its input was. SSH by default, uses this method.

Here are the available MAC choices:

  1. hmac-md5
  2. hmac-md5-96
  3. hmac-ripemd160
  4. hmac-sha1
  5. hmac-sha1-96
  6. hmac-sha2-256
  7. hmac-sha2-512
  8. umac-64
  9. umac-128
  10. hmac-md5-etm
  11. hmac-md5-96-etm
  12. hmac-ripemd160-etm
  13. hmac-sha1-etm
  14. hmac-sha1-96-etm
  15. hmac-sha2-256-etm
  16. hmac-sha2-512-etm
  17. umac-64-etm
  18. umac-128-etm

The selection considerations:

  • Security of the hash algorithm: No MD5 and SHA1. Yes, I know that HMAC-SHA1 does not need collision resistance but why wait? Disable weak crypto today.
  • Encrypt-then-MAC: I am not aware of a security proof for CTR-and-HMAC but I also don’t think CTR decryption can fail. Since there are no downgrade attacks, you can add them to the end of the list. You can also do this on a host by host basis so you know which ones are less safe.
  • Tag size: At least 128 bits. This eliminates umac-64-etm.
  • Key size: At least 128 bits. This doesn’t eliminate anything at this point.




MACs [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],hmac-sha2-512,hmac-sha2-256,hmac-ripemd160,[email protected]




Host *
    MACs [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],hmac-sha2-512,hmac-sha2-256,hmac-ripemd160,[email protected]

Preventing key theft

Even with forward secrecy the secret keys must be kept secret. The NSA has a database of stolen keys – you do not want your key there.

System hardening

This post is not intended to be a comprehensive system security guide. Very briefly:

  • Don’t install what you don’t need: Every single line of code has a chance of containing a bug. Some of these bugs are security holes. Fewer lines, fewer holes.
  • Use free software: As in speech. You want to use code that’s actually reviewed or that you can review yourself. There is no way to achieve that without source code. Someone may have reviewed proprietary crap but who knows.
  • Keep your software up to date: New versions often fix critical security holes.
  • Exploit mitigation: Sad but true – there will always be security holes in your software. There are things you can do to prevent their exploitation such GCC’s -fstack-protector. One of the best security projects out there is Grsecurity. Use it or use OpenBSD.

Traffic analysis resistance

Set up Tor hidden services for your SSH servers. This has multiple advantages. It provides an additional layer of encryption and server authentication. People looking at your traffic will not know your IP, so they will be unable to scan and target other services running on the same server and client. Attackers can still attack these services but don’t know if it has anything to do with the observed traffic until they actually break in.

Now this is only true if you don’t disclose your SSH server’s fingerprint in any other way. You should only accept connections from the hidden service or from LAN, if required.

If you don’t need LAN access, you can add the following line to




Add this to



HiddenServiceDir /var/lib/tor/hidden_service/ssh
HiddenServicePort 22

You will find the hostname you have to use in


. You also have to configure the client to use Tor. For this, socat will be needed. Add the following line to



Host *.onion
    ProxyCommand socat - SOCKS4A:localhost:%h:%p,socksport=9050

Host *

If you want to allow connections from LAN, don’t use the


line, configure your firewall instead.

Key storage

You should encrypt your client key files using a strong password. Additionally, you can use

ssh-keygen -o -a $number

to slow down cracking attempts by iterating the hash function many times. You may want to store them on a pendrive and only plug it in when you want to use SSH. Are you more likely to lose your pendrive or have your system compromised? I don’t know.

Unfortunately, you can’t encrypt your server key and it must be always available, or else sshd won’t start. The only thing protecting it is OS access controls.

The end

It’s probably a good idea to test the changes.

ssh -v

will print the selected algorithms and also makes problems easier to spot. Be extremely careful when configuring SSH on a remote host. Always keep an active session, never restart sshd. Instead you can send the


signal to reload the configuration without killing your session. You can be even more careful by starting a new sshd instance on a different port and testing that.

Can you make these changes? If the answer is yes, then…

NSA Happy Dance

If the answer is no, it’s probably due to compatibility problems. You can try to convince the other side to upgrade their security and turn it into a yes.

If you work for a big company and change management doesn’t let you do it, I’m sorry. I’ve seen the v1 protocol enabled in such places. There is no chance of improvement. Give up to preseve your sanity.

Special thanks to the people of Twitter for the improvements.


You may have noticed that this document changed since last time. I want to be very transparent about this. There were three major changes:

  • After some debate and going back and forth between including GCM or not, it’s now back again. The reason for dropping it was that SSH doesn’t encrypt packet sizes when using GCM. The reason for bringing it back is that SSH does the same with any EtM algorithms. There is no way around this unless you can live with chacha20-poly1305 only. Also, the leaked documents don’t sound like they can figure out the lengths or confirm presence of some things, more like straight up “send it to us and we’ll decrypt it for you”. Wrapping SSH in a Tor hidden service will take care of any traffic analysis concerns.
  • I’m now allowing Encrypt-and-MAC algorithms with CTR ciphers as a last resort. I initially thought it was possible to use downgrade attacks, I now think it is not.
  • I briefly disabled RSA because it uses SHA1, this turned out to be a non-issue because we’re signing SHA2 hashes.

You can see the full list of changes on github. I promise not to use

git push -f